| Why science should stay out of understanding human nature … before something worse than this happens. Sat, 04 Feb 2012 |
| | There is danger involved in labeling essentially normal kids as sick. more >>more>> |
| Extraterrestrial life: Shaking off some of the Mars dust Sat, 04 Feb 2012 |
| | "This implies that liquid water has been on the surface of Mars for far too short a time for life to maintain a foothold on the surface." more >>more>> |
| Peer review: Co-authors of disputed arsenic-based life paper have vanished into the woodwork? Sat, 04 Feb 2012 |
| | "It appears they bought and fueled the bus; put bright lights and banners on it; cheered as Wolfe-Simon drove it a bit wildly honking the horn; and have now thrown her under it." more >>more>> |
| Fossil finds: Shieldcroc! Mother of all crocodiles? Sat, 04 Feb 2012 |
| | Age of the Dinosaurs should be called Age of the Crocs? more >>more>> |
| New York Times: Gray Lady not homeless … yet Fri, 03 Feb 2012 |
| | Decreasing numbers of people believe something because they “saw it in the Times.” more >>more>> |
| A modest proposal re peer reviewed papers Fri, 03 Feb 2012 |
| | Someone should compile a list of peer-reviewed papers in respected journals in recent years that are not good news for Darwinism. more >>more>> |
| Remember that Fate of Darwinism paper? Here’s what it says on Dawkins’ selfish gene … Fri, 03 Feb 2012 |
| | ".... When all other things are actually made equal by spelling out in detail the developmental process by which genes express traits, any self-replicative privilege assigned to genes disappears completely." more >>more>> |
| Michael Flannery: Where Jerry Fodor’s critique of Darwinism misses the boat Fri, 03 Feb 2012 |
| | "The authors are at least to be commended for giving the world a non-habit-forming sleep aid." more >>more>> |
| From The First Gene: Chapter 8: “Redundant, low-informational selfordering is not organization.” Fri, 03 Feb 2012 |
| | Unwanted cross-reactions are invariably ignored in these celebrated models. more >>more>> |
| “Intelligent design talking points” are now legitimate science? Fri, 03 Feb 2012 |
| | "The fact that, after three years, these standards have not even been challenged, supports the findings of the Fordham report and not the hysterical statements made at the time of their adoption by some evolutionists." more >>more>> |
