CNN's Errors: A Scientific Refutation of the Documentary
“Walking with Cavemen”

The documentary “Walking with Cavemen,” screened by CNN, consists of Darwinist propaganda which is riddled with scientific errors and distortions.

At the end of December 2003, the television channel CNN announced that it would be screening a documentary called “Walking with Cavemen. More >>>

The September 2003 edition of Natural History carried an article titled “Love and Death,” which dealt with a study by the evolutionary biologists Matthias W. Foellmer and Daphne J. Fairbaim. (“Spontaneous Male Death During Copulation in an Orb-veawing Spider”, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B (Suppl.) DOI 10. 108/rsbl.2003.0042, 2003)

The researchers had observed that the males of the Argiope aurantia species of spider live for an average of 15 minutes after mating, and that their hearts suddenly stop, though not as a result of any action by the females. More >>>

A piece of research carried out by Peter Ungar from Arkansas University and his colleagues has recently hit the headlines. In the study, the tooth morphologies of Australopithecus afarensis and so-called evolutionarily primitive members of the genus Homo were compared. Ungar was seeking to develop a platform that would be useful in measuring the kind of abrasion brought about by which kinds of foods, forms of wear and the surfaces of the teeth he examined, and he evaluated the anatomical differences between the teeth studied from the point of view of feeding habits. More >>>

The Discovery Channel recently broadcast a documentary called "The Real Eve," in which imaginary scenarios were put forward regarding the spread of modern man, who allegedly emerged by means of evolution in Africa, to the rest of the world.

However, scientific discoveries show that the evolution of man is nothing but a fantasy, and that the claims made on The Discovery Channel are unfounded. More >>>

On September 25, 2003, cnn.com carried a report headed “Dog DNA reveals man's link with best friend” The report dealt with a study on the DNA of a male poodle performed by Ewen F. Kirkness and his team. Cnn.com interpreted the results of the research from an evolutionist perspective, writing that man is closer to the dog than to the mouse. It carried the following comments from Craig Venter, of the human genome project, regarding the research:

We are much closer to the dog than to the mouse in terms of our gene content . More >>>

In its 27 September, 2003, edition, New Scientist carried an article called “Relic Hints at Primal Force.” This article added further speculation to the fantasy that life began with natural phenomena and coincidences.

The report in New Scientist described an enzyme existing in modern bacteria and which draws energy from a molecule known as pyrophosphate, and claimed that this enzyme could have supplied the necessary energy requirement at the so-called chance beginning of life. More >>>

The documentary ‘The Horses Empire,’ broadcast on National Geographic TV on August 20, brought the evolutionist claims regarding the origins of the horse to our screens. However, these claims regarding the origin of the horse rested on a number of imaginary fossils, the invalidity of which had been demonstrated years before.

One important subject in the origin of mammals is the myth of the "evolution of the horse," also a topic to which evolutionist publications have devoted a considerable amount of space for a long time. More >>>

The July 26, 2003, edition of New Scientist magazine contained a claim concerning the so-called evolutionary origin of multi-cellular organisms. The article, titled "How Animals Learned to Stick Together", discussed the molecular analyses carried out by Wisconsin-Madison University biologist Nicole King. It was maintained in the article that findings obtained as the result of King's research had resolved a number of problems regarding how animals evolved from single-celled organisms. More >>>

The August 19, 2003, edition of the New York Times carried an article by Nicholas Wade called "Why Humans and Their Fur Parted Ways." In this article Wade enquired into the reasons why, unlike many mammals, man should be without fur, and dealt with this question in the framework of scenarios regarding human evolution.

Wade's preconceptions on the subject were apparent right from the first sentence: "One of the most distinctive evolutionary changes as humans parted company from their fellow apes was their loss of body hair. More >>>

On August 13, 2003, the Discovery Channel broadcast a documentary called Science of Beauty. The documentary dealt with the alleged evolutionary development of the concept of beauty, and contained ever more nonsensical claims on the subject. It attached special importance to the views of evolutionary psychologists, but rather than being science what it related was actually a fairy tale. More >>>

An article titled "Human Nature: New rules for an old game" was carried in the May 24, 2003, edition of New Scientist magazine. The paper was most interesting from the point of view of revealing the inconsistencies to which evolutionists' errors and their blind devotion thereto have led them. The article contained an interview with Sarah Blaffer Hrdy, emeritus professor of anthropology from University of California. More >>>

For a very long time, the evolutionist choir has been propagating the unsubstantiated thesis that there is very little genetic difference between humans and chimps. In every piece of evolutionist literature, you could read sentences like "we are 99 percent equal to chimps" or "there is only 1 percent of DNA that makes us human". More >>>

An article titled "Laughter" was published in the April 2003 issue of Discover magazine. The article attempted to explain happiness from a materialistic perspective, drawing on neuroembryologist Robert Provine's views. It was claimed that that the brainstem coordinating the muscle movements in laughter was primitive and that laughter benefited evolution. More >>>

The May 8, 2002, edition of Nature magazine carried a study showing the terrible dilemma facing the Darwinist account of biocomplexity. Unable to offer any scientific evidence from nature, the fossil record or the laboratory to back up the claim that the complex features in living things were acquired in stages, Darwinists were apparently seeking consolation in the virtual world. More >>>

Towards the end of January, the History Channel television company embarked on evolutionist propaganda consisting of four programs. Interestingly enough, this propaganda was not limited to the History Channel, since other channels such as National Geographic and Discovery Channel stepped up their own evolutionist propaganda at exactly that same time. More >>>

Documentaries recently broadcast on National Geographic TV and the History Channel dealt with the Neanderthals, an ancient human race. National Geographic's program was called "Neandertal Enigma," and the History Channel's "The Fate of the Neanderthals." The programs dealt with when and where the Neanderthals had lived and their cultural and anatomical features. Fossils and objects belonging to Neanderthals obtained from archaeological digs were shown. More >>>

The documentary “Evolution: The Great Explosion in Intelligence” broadcast on the Discovery Channel set out a number of Darwinist claims on the subject of human intelligence and culture. Considerable space was devoted to the views of such unrepentant Darwinist scientists as Steven Pinker and Richard Dawkins. More >>>